Hi @moleculeboost The total EGF is $90k. ~30% will be used as FX liquidity on FX-swap and won’t be sold. The rest will be released gradually, and given FX’s trading volume, it won’t impact the market if we need to sell FX.
Ok. I’m just a bit disappointed that Kawaii Chaos is not part of the equation anymore… Maybe later ?
Absolutely, as mentioned before, the development cost for Kawaii Chaos is significantly higher in terms of both budget and time. Given the current market trend and Indra’s preference not to fund undeveloped apps, we’re treading cautiously.
Our immediate goal is to build trust with the FX foundation and the community. Once that’s established, we can consider seeking a second grant for Kawaii Chaos
what is the problem of not being in the top 50…too low APY to you Delegators or what is the exact reason…i am asking as a Delegator
Hey guys, let’s stay on the topic regarding ZooGames proposal.
To answer your question @Darry, only active validators can earn rewards.
When can we put this forward lets get some movement. A day in crypto is a month in real life
Now that proposal #40 passed, I’d be eager to get @indra and others’ positions on that new proposal…
@John_Blair , we like to take some time in FunctionX community and work things out insted of driving full speedyand hitting a wall.
Any way, i’ll be supporting this proposal. Zoogames already convinced me with zooracer, the poker game and the telegram quizz game.
Howdy, this proposal is not clear. What kind of game does this team want to build & how can they invite users to come to FX?
I will vote yes for the team’s track record and NO for the proposal unless they provide more information and clear plans.
The plan is crystal clear, and the game’s theme will likely be strategy-based. Everything has been discussed in this thread and is detailed as thoroughly as possible. I find your post really frustrating.
Everything is clearly explained just a few posts above. If you choose to vote ‘NO’, that’s your decision, but we won’t be changing our stance as we’ve already offered our best.
@moleculeboost : long discussions happened in this thread, and we can’t say the proposal is not clear. There are still uncertainties, but which are not tied to ZooGames but to the market, to the future users, etc. From what I see, there is a lot of activity in ZooGames TGs, even more than in FunctionX TGs.
Howdy! I’m referring to strategies for increasing user participation, which is essential to the game’s success. There were no other players in the game after a 10-minute wait when I tried zooracer on my macbook. The fact that function x wants more users from zoogames and zoogames wants more users from function x will be a problem in this situation. It might end up being another foxchange, where after receiving grants they keep whining about the user base.
It’s a good idea, but the timing is off with this one. The situation will change if function x can increase usage during the next six to twelve months.
We’ve clearly outlined our strategy to attract more users to FX. We’re introducing a complete gaming ecosystem, which isn’t the same as what Foxgaming is doing.
Also, check out our marketing strategy focused on airdrops and giveaways. If you have doubts, know that this is our main tactic to drive engagement to the FX chains, along with the FXgora NFT marketplace and other vZOO incentives we’ve mentioned in this thread.
Regarding Zooracers, it’s still in Beta – feel free to join our community for a game session.
i will support your proposal
Howdy! Who are your target recipients for airdrops and giveaways? The current fx community is relatively small, and I am interested in who your target audience is. Perhaps it would be beneficial if you could share the numbers of your present players as well as a solid way to bring them to fx.
Blockchain games are not sustainable in larger chains, and it will struggle to give an impact on a small and growing chain like fx. This idea is too early, it will not benefit this chain at this stage.
In the latter half of your comment you said small chains cant support it and big chains cant sustain it.
Do you believe blockchain gaming will work at all? There isnt much wiggle room in your juxtapositions.
I cant soeak for the team but i would assume the target audience is outaide of the current userbase.
Zooracera did a incentive campaign but very very little marketing around it, ans i believe they had like 450 unqiue users over a 2 week period. This was many many months ago, possibly even 2022.
People love incentives, people will come. The issue is keeping them. That comes from community, persistent incentives (both crypto and ingame progress), and marketing - ofcourse.
I believe the team has covered all that.
Not sure about fox gaming nft marketplace, but zoo has alot of things already built ans also has a dedicated userbase
Actually, regarding blockchain gaming, you need to have a look at ZooGames protocol and what makes it interesting from a blockchain perspective. It’s like a layer 2 protocol that avoids all the hassle of signing transactions…
Then, I’d say that growing the userbase is a long-term effort. What’s sure is you have to implement early if you want to grow long-term.
That’s why I’m eager to see the FXgora implemented and to see a first game running…
Maybe one day, they’ll run the ZooGames protocol directly onchain using a subnet…
And 1 last thing I wanted to say : whether you vote YES, NO, NO WITH VETO or even ABSTAIN, the most important thing from a DAO governance perspective is TO VOTE !
But for now, the proposal’s not on the table yet… Still waiting from some input from team members…
The EGF council (@kenorb , @zaccheah , @Richard and myself) didn’t even discuss it yet : cf. here
Maybe we should insist on the fact that we are not bringing just a blockchain game but a whole gaming ecosystem with liquidity, marketplace and gaming environment with ZooGames platform. Not quite comparable with most of one-chain sided games that you can find somewhere else. In fact, ZooGames being EVM compatible makes our targets much wider that Zoo and FX communities, which will be beneficial for both ecosystems in terms of adoption.
Hey guys, got a question about the game out of curiosity and anticipation.
Which type of games will you guys be leaning more towards? I’m aware it’s a strategy-based game. Are there any details beyond just strategy-based? Would love a peak into the direction of the game.
Strategy-based games can come in the form of card games or social games such as AmongUs.
- For example, Kawaii Chaos - We know it’s a strategy-base game & an FPS category.
- Strategy-based is quite a broad term, would love to know the main or sub category.
Reason being is so that everyone can anticipate exactly what kind of game will be coming.