I understand the ecosystem. On paper what you are saying makes sense. Reality is different.
-
Purse has no demand and team is struggling to create it. It’s a “world class” loyalty product if there is a demand, otherwise it’s useless. Look at what %of Pundix tokens are delegated to Pundix chain to earn PURSE vs % of FX delegated to earn FX and you will see for yourself. Point is, PURSE is not working out.
-
Yes, CSP is for main net development. And using it to promote FX’s first chain (PundiX) is supporting development. Also, distributing FX tokens (instead of purse) to XPOS merchants and users will increase FX awareness (marketing).
-
CSP is not a limited supply of tokens but rather a continuously increasing pool. A portion of it being used to promote PundiX is feasible. Currently these funds are not being used at all and there are probably over 60 million fx tokens there. @FrenchXCore did a good thread on CSP Guidebook : what's the difference between EGF and CSP?
In short, both projects will benefits from substituting FX for purse. We have supply to fund it and it will reduce marketing scope of team, thus yielding better results. Creating 2 brands is easier than creating 3.