I believe it’s time for the CEO to decide here, the only one who knows what’s truly the best option. Grtz
My second question was: there no Max supply:
In what case study more supply might be needed?
Maximum supply, if there is one, defined, just caps the number of tokens that can ever be available.
Alright that I got it, Max supply mean Max…
But Purse was made with an unlimited supply with a system DBL …
question is: Is there time we need to add supply ?
If yes in what situation it happens?
Just wondering why they decided to have unlimited supply for purse?
- Supply of $PURSE is added by staking PUNDIX.
- I think as $PURSE was conceived as a non-monetary reward token, having an unlimited supply might allow for wider circulation of the token.
- The value of $PURSE is ultimately what kind of future offers are made to exchange them for other than for money.
Great so I will follow the main objective of the token Purse amd shouldn’t have a limit supply.
Thanks clarifying all that.
I would vote to keep it as it is for the main long term vision of its creation
That’s my take
If PURSE have a limit supply and purchase has financial value, more people will delegate PUNDIX. And it will lead to the improvement of PUNDIX value
- Transaction fees need to be low cost for adoption of XPOS transactions on PUNDIX Chain to grow.
- $PURSE tokens might, hopefully, eventually be monetizable, but monetizing $PURSE at this early stage of PUNDIX Chain is likely to hinder growth.
- Earning $PURSE and $PUNDIX and HODLing them is a long game.